Tʜʀᴇᴇ Rᴇᴀsᴏɴs Wʜʏ ᴛʜᴇ Tᴇʀᴍs 'Sᴇᴄᴏɴᴅ-Cʟᴀss Uᴘᴘᴇʀ' ᴀɴᴅ 'Sᴇᴄᴏɴᴅ-Cʟᴀss Lᴏᴡᴇʀ' Aʀᴇ Iɴᴄᴏʀʀᴇᴄᴛ
When discussing degree classifications, terms like UPPER SECOND-CLASS and LOWER SECOND-CLASS are the correct and standard forms, while SECOND-CLASS UPPER and SECOND-CLASS LOWER are grammatically incorrect. Here’s why:
1. 𝗔𝗱𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲-𝗡𝗼𝘂𝗻 𝗢𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿
In English, adjectives like "upper" and "lower" come before the nouns they modify.
📍She graduated with an upper second-class degree. ✅
She graduated with a second-class upper degree. ❌
📍 He earned a lower second-class honours in Business Administration ✅
He earned a second-class lower in Business Administration. ❌
2. 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗢𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗺𝘀
Degree classifications like "first-class" and "third-class" follow a clear structure where the modifier comes first. Deviating from this pattern disrupts consistency:
📍 I was awarded a first-class honour. ✅
I was awarded a class-first honour. ❌
📍 He obtained a third-class degree. ✅
He obtained a class-third degree. ❌
3. 𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀
The terms "upper second-class" and "lower second-class" are internationally recognized, particularly in British and Commonwealth academic systems. Using informal alternatives like "second-class upper" may cause confusion in formal or international contexts. For example:
In a job application:
📍 I graduated with an upper second-class honours in Economics. ✅
I graduated with a second-class upper honour in Economics. ❌
Comments
Post a Comment